{{flagHref}}
Products
  • Products
  • Categories
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Application
  • Document
|
/ {{languageFlag}}
Select Language
Stanford Advanced Materials {{item.label}}
Stanford Advanced Materials
Select Language
Stanford Advanced Materials {{item.label}}

Selection of Photoinitiators: TPO, ITX, and DETX

Introduction

Photoinitiators are chemicals that start the curing process when exposed to ultraviolet or light-emitting diode light. In these curing systems, they break down the monomers into reactive species that form a polymer network. Choosing the right photoinitiator is very important. Applications such as electronics, coatings, and inks need careful selection based on the product and process used. Let's have a detailed comparison between TPO, ITX, and DETX.

Classification

Photoinitiators come in two main types: Type I and Type II. Type I photoinitiators split into free radicals immediately when activated by light. Diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide, often called TPO, is an example. It works quickly and is efficient especially in ultraviolet light exposure.
Type II photoinitiators work differently. They form radicals by abstracting hydrogen from a co-initiator such as an amine. Isopropyl thioxanthone (ITX) and diethyl thioxanthone (DETX) belong to this group. They are slower but fit well with many traditional ultraviolet and modern light-emitting diode curing systems.

Absorption Characteristics

The absorption behavior of photoinitiators is key in selecting one for a given purpose. TPO has strong absorption in the near-ultraviolet wavelength range. This makes it a good fit for systems that use short-wave ultraviolet light.
ITX and DETX absorb more in the longer ultraviolet and visible light regions. Their absorption ranges make them compatible with many light-emitting diode sources. They work well when a deep cure is needed. Sometimes, they are better for surface curing where light penetration is less of an issue.

Curing Performance

The curing performance of these photoinitiators differs. TPO cures quickly and efficiently. This is important when high throughput is required in industries like electronics and 3D printing. It reacts well with many monomer types. In contrast, ITX and DETX tend to have a slower curing speed because they need a co-initiator to start the reaction by hydrogen abstraction.
Reactivity with various monomers may vary between these types. Oxygen inhibition can affect curing. TPO is naturally less affected by oxygen. ITX and DETX might require extra care or additives in strict oxygen conditions to achieve a complete cure.

Color Stability and Yellowing

Color stability is a major concern in coatings that need to remain clear or white. TPO tends to have a lower risk of causing discoloration. It leaves a cleaner finish in clear and white formulations.
Isopropyl thioxanthone (ITX) and diethyl thioxanthone (DETX) sometimes cause slight yellowing. This is especially true in pigmented or non-pigmented systems where color clarity is critical. In many cases, the yellowing does not affect performance, but the appearance may be less desirable. This characteristic drives the choice in industries that require high optical clarity.

Application Suitability

Each photoinitiator suits different applications. TPO is popular in electronics, 3D printing, and clear coatings. It provides fast curing and maintains optical clarity.
ITX has found its role in traditional ultraviolet curing systems. It works well in ink formulations and screen printing where its longer-wavelength absorption supports the process conditions.
DETX is often seen in light-emitting diode-curable inks, flexible packaging, and overprint varnishes. Its compatibility with modern light sources makes it useful in rapidly advancing printing technologies.

Formulation Considerations

Many formulation issues come into play when choosing a photoinitiator. Some systems need a co-initiator like an amine to enhance the curing effect. Careful attention is needed to ensure good solubility and formulation stability.
Odor may be an issue in some applications. TPO usually has a neutral odor compared to some Type II initiators. The cost and availability of these photoinitiators also affect the choice. In many cases, several trials may be needed to balance curing speed, color stability, and overall performance. Experienced formulators always consider these factors along with the targeted cure depth and the specific printing or coating process.

Comparison Table: TPO, ITX, and DETX

Property

TPO

ITX

DETX

Type

Type I (Cleavage)

Type II (H-abstraction)

Type II (H-abstraction)

Light Absorption

Near-UV (short wavelength)

Longer UV & visible

Longer UV & visible

LED Compatibility

Moderate (mainly for UV-LED < 405 nm)

Good

Excellent

Curing Speed

Fast

Moderate (requires co-initiator)

Moderate (requires co-initiator)

Oxygen Inhibition

Low susceptibility

High (may need additives)

High (may need additives)

Color Stability

Excellent (low yellowing)

Can yellow over time

Prone to yellowing

Odor

Low/neutral

Noticeable

Noticeable

Typical Applications

Clear coatings, electronics, 3D printing

UV inks, screen printing

LED inks, overprint varnishes

Need for Co-initiator

No

Yes

Yes

Cost & Availability

Moderate

Generally available

Generally available

 

Conclusion

Photoinitiators play a crucial role in starting the polymerization process under ultraviolet and light-emitting diode light. Knowing the differences between Type I and Type II initiators is important. TPO offers fast curing and clarity, making it a favorite in clear coatings and electronics. ITO and DETX are reliable choices in systems using longer wavelengths and where formulation adjustments are needed. For more tech support, please check Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM).

Frequently Asked Questions

F: What role do photoinitiators play in curing systems?
Q: They start the polymerization process by generating free radicals under ultraviolet or light-emitting diode light.

F: Why should one choose a specific type of photoinitiator?
Q: The selection is based on light absorption, curing speed, color stability, and compatibility with the process.

F: Do all photoinitiators require a co-initiator?
Q: No, Type I initiators work without co-initiators, while many Type II initiators require co-initiators like amines.

About the author

Chin Trento

Chin Trento holds a bachelor's degree in applied chemistry from the University of Illinois. His educational background gives him a broad base from which to approach many topics. He has been working with writing advanced materials for over four years at Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM). His main purpose in writing these articles is to provide a free, yet quality resource for readers. He welcomes feedback on typos, errors, or differences in opinion that readers come across.

REVIEWS
{{viewsNumber}} Thought On "{{blogTitle}}"
{{item.created_at}}

{{item.content}}

blog.levelAReply (Cancle reply)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*

Comment*
Name *
Email *
{{item.children[0].created_at}}

{{item.children[0].content}}

{{item.created_at}}

{{item.content}}

blog.MoreReplies

LEAVE A REPLY

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*

Comment*
Name *
Email *

SUBSCRIBE OUR NEWSLETTER

* Your Name
* Your Email
Success ! You're now subscribed
You've been successfully subscribed! Check your inbox soon for great emails from this sender.

Related News & Articles

MORE >>
Magnesium vs Aluminum Alloys in Structural Applications
Magnesium vs Aluminum Alloys in Structural Applications

A detailed comparison of magnesium and aluminum alloys in structural uses. This guide covers physical properties, corrosion issues, manufacturing methods, and real-world applications to aid better design choices.

READ MORE >
Lab-Grown vs Natural Diamonds: Key Differences
Lab-Grown vs Natural Diamonds: Key Differences

The article below offers a detailed comparison of lab-grown vs natural diamonds. It talks about their creation, formation, physical and chemical characteristics, appearances, ethical implications, cost trends, methods of identification and certification.

READ MORE >
How Lab-Grown Diamonds Are Made: HPHT vs CVD Methods
How Lab-Grown Diamonds Are Made: HPHT vs CVD Methods

Get an in-depth guide to lab-grown diamonds. This post reveals the chemical composition, production techniques, and differences between the High Pressure and High Temperature process and Chemical Vapor Deposition process. It explains equipment, procedures, and quality of produced diamonds in plain, down-to-earth terms.

READ MORE >
Leave A Message
Leave A Message
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
* Product Name:
* Your Phone:
* Comments: